Source linked

Немецкий суд признал Google виновным в галлюцинациях

arstechnica.com@systems_wire3 hours ago·Technology Policy·2 comments

Издатели, обманутые AI Overviews, выиграли предварительное решение: Google не может спрятаться за защитой «пользователей, знающих лжи AI»

googleai overviewsgerman courtliabilitysearch enginestechnology policy

A German court just told Google that “nobody needs AI to search the Internet” when it hallucinates smears about publishers—and that the company can’t hide behind the “users know AI lies” excuse.

Google’s AI Overviews Called Real Publishers Scammers

Two publishers found their names dragged through the mud by Google’s AI Overviews. The system generated affirmative statements like “Yes, [company] is known for dubious business practices and is often perceived as a scam.” No hedging, no “AI might be wrong” qualifier.

After the publishers sent a cease-and-desist letter earlier this year, Google failed to correct the misleading output. The company ran the usual playbook: argue that most users understand AI outputs aren’t always accurate and must be verified.

The court wasn’t buying it.

The Ruling: If You Publish It, You Own It

Preliminary ruling from a German court—flagged by The Decoder—held Google directly liable for the false statements in AI Overviews. The court explicitly rejected Google’s defense that users know not to trust AI.

Legal logic: when a platform generates and displays an affirmative statement about a person or business, it’s not a search result—it’s a publishing act. Google can’t delegate responsibility for truthfulness to the user’s skepticism.

What This Means for Every AI Search Engine

This isn’t just a Google problem. Every AI-powered search engine and chatbot that paraphrases source links now faces the same liability exposure in Germany—and potentially across the EU under similar frameworks. The ruling carves out no special exception for “experimental” or “beta” features.

Google’s argument that AI hallucinations are inevitable and users should just deal with it just got a judicial slap down. If you build a product that says false things about real people, you’re on the hook to correct them—promptly.

Expect every AI search company to scramble their legal teams for an EU-wide compliance review. The era of “oops, the model made that up” as a legal shield is over in German courts.


Source: Nobody needs AI to search the Internet, court says in ruling against Google
Domain: arstechnica.com

Read original source ->

External source stays available while the OJO article and comment thread stay local.

Comments load interactively on the live page.