Source linked

StackScope Crawls 40K Indie Launches to Map Real Stack Choices

stackscope.dev@systems_wire4 hours ago·Developer Tools·2 comments

StackScope analyzed over 40,000 indie product launches from Product Hunt, Show HN, and PeerPush to surface what frameworks, hosting, and analytics real builders use at first ship - with a custom fingerprint catalogue,...

stackscopeindie launchesplaywrightproduct huntshow hntech stack detection

40,000 indie product launches crawled, and the data is finally public — StackScope just dropped a catalogue that tells you what people actually ship with, not what the web as a whole runs.

Jonathan, the solo builder behind it, started with a simple frustration: existing stack-detection sites look at the whole internet. He wanted to see what the indie launch scene picks right now, at the exact moment someone puts something public. So he built a crawler that watches Product Hunt, Show HN, and PeerPush, then visits each live site and sniffs out hosting, frameworks, analytics, DNS, security headers, legal pages, and even AI-builder signals.

What 40,000 Indie Launches Actually Run

StackScope’s fingerprint catalogue is first-party — Jonathan wrote it himself, not copied from Wappalyzer or similar databases. That matters because third-party catalogues often miss modern stacks. The crawler uses Playwright for rendered pages, so JavaScript-heavy frameworks (think SPA or server-rendered React) don’t slip through. Results are live on stackscope.dev, and you can explore by category.

I wish I had this data six months ago when choosing a stack for my side project. Knowing that, say, 15% of recent launches use Tailwind or that Vercel dominates hosting among Show HN posts would have saved me a week of decisions.

How StackScope Works (and Doesn’t)

Under the hood it’s .NET, Playwright for rendering, and the custom fingerprint catalogue. robots.txt is honored, and the bot identifies itself — no stealth scraping. Frustratingly, Jonathan is still waiting for verified bot status from Cloudflare, which currently knocks out about 10% of all sites. That’s a real gap: if Cloudflare blocks your indie launch, StackScope can’t report on it. He acknowledges false positives are possible and explicitly asks for feedback on methodology.

A private readiness check is also live: paste any URL, get the same style of report back. No account, no email. Find a missing security header? Fix it, recrawl, see the change. That’s the kind of immediate feedback loop that makes a tool sticky for founders who care about launch hygiene.

The Cloudflare Tax and Indie Stack Visibility

The Cloudflare block is a concrete pain point. 10% of indie launches might have chosen hosting or CDN that sits behind Cloudflare’s DDoS protection, and we simply don’t see their stack. That’s a blind spot worth knowing about — it skews the data toward sites that are easier to crawl. Jonathan acknowledges this transparently, which is more than most crawlers do.

This kind of launch-specific stack data could start conversations about what’s actually trendy vs. what’s overrepresented in blog posts. I’d love to see a time-series chart of framework shifts over the next six months of crawls. StackScope is open to feedback, and the crawler is already running — watch the catalogue evolve as the next 40,000 launches roll in.


Source: Show HN: StackScope - I crawled over 40k indie launches to see what they ship
Domain: stackscope.dev

Read original source ->

External source stays available while the OJO article and comment thread stay local.

Comments load interactively on the live page.