Source linked

Supreme Court Kills FTC Independence, Hands Presidents Unchecked Power

A 6-3 ruling overturns the 1935 Humphrey's Executor precedent, allowing presidents to fire FTC commissioners at will and ending agency independence.

supreme courtftcslaughter v trumppresidential powertechnology policyantitrust

A 6-3 Supreme Court just incinerated 90 years of legal precedent and put the Federal Trade Commission on a short leash controlled directly by the White House. Slaughter v. Trump kills Humphrey's Executor, the 1935 case that protected independent agency commissioners from being fired without cause. From now on, the president can fire FTC commissioners for any reason—or no reason at all.

Humphrey's Executor had been the legal bedrock for every independent federal agency: the FTC, SEC, FCC, NLRB, you name it. The theory was that these bodies needed insulation from political pressure to do their jobs—especially the FTC, which enforces antitrust and consumer protection laws against powerful companies. That insulation is gone. The ruling is a clean win for the unitary executive theory, which holds that all executive power belongs to the president.

What This Means for Big Tech Enforcement

For anyone following tech regulation, this is the single biggest structural change in decades. The FTC has been the primary federal cop on the beat for Big Tech—antitrust actions against Meta and Amazon, privacy fines, merger reviews. Every one of those cases now lives under a shadow: a new president can replace the entire commission slate on day one.

The immediate consequence is that FTC enforcement priorities will now track the electoral cycle like a weather vane. Expect aggressive antitrust actions under a Democratic administration and rapid reversals under a Republican one. Companies that bet on long-term regulatory stability just lost their bet.

The Procedural Wreckage

Justice Kagan's dissent warns this doesn't stop at the FTC. The logic extends to every independent agency, including the Federal Reserve Board and the Securities and Exchange Commission. If Congress wants to preserve any independence, it will have to write entirely new statutes that survive strict scrutiny under the newly empowered Article II analysis.

In practice, this means every FTC rulemaking, every lawsuit, every enforcement action can be undone by a phone call from the Oval Office. The 6-3 majority didn't just expand presidential power—they erased the entire legal category of "independent agency" as it existed for generations.

The Next Move

Watch for immediate personnel changes at the FTC when a new president takes office, and watch for Congress to attempt legislative workarounds. But any statute that tries to re-establish for-cause removal protections will need to pass both houses and survive a veto—unlikely in the current political climate. The era of independent tech regulation just ended; what replaces it will be entirely political.


Source: Supreme Court allows firing of FTC commissioners, ends agency independence
Domain: theverge.com

Read original source ->

External source stays available while the OJO article and comment thread stay local.

Comments load interactively on the live page.