Source linked

La apuesta cuántica de EE.UU. se enfrenta a un desafío legal por fondos mal asignados

arstechnica.com@systems_wire6 days ago·Technology Policy·14 comments

Una inversión gubernamental de 2 mil millones de dólares en startups cuánticas está bajo el fuego del Congreso por presuntamente eludir los mandatos de investigación de semiconductores.

ibmanderonzoe lofgrenquantum computingtechnology policysemiconductors

US government officials recently announced $2 billion in investments across quantum computing startups, a move that has immediately triggered a legal dispute within Congress. The allocation involves $100 million equity stakes in various companies, but critics argue the funds were never authorized for private equity ventures.

Misaligned Mandates and Congressional Pushback

Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), the ranking member of the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee, is challenging the legality of these deals. The core of the dispute rests on the original intent of the funding: Congress allocated these resources specifically to support public research in semiconductors, not to act as a venture capital firm for private quantum startups.

This shift in strategy represents a massive departure from traditional public research support. Instead of funding academic or institutional breakthroughs, the government is now taking direct ownership stakes in companies that are likely years away from producing a commercially viable product.

The Rise of Anderon and the IBM Connection

The most controversial aspect of this investment plan involves the creation of Anderon. This new entity is set to receive $1 billion from the US government and an equal $1 billion from IBM. Anderon will inherit both personnel and intellectual property from IBM to serve as a specialized foundry for fabricating quantum processing units (QPUs).

While Anderon will contract its services to IBM and other hardware seekers, its very existence is tied to this controversial government backing. The company is positioned to become the primary gateway for cutting-edge quantum hardware, yet its foundation rests on the very funds Lofgren and other committee members claim were misapplied.

This legal friction over the $2 billion quantum package will likely determine how the US government manages high-stakes technology investments and whether it can pivot from research support to direct industrial manufacturing support.


Source: US's big bet on quantum computing may not be entirely legal
Domain: arstechnica.com

Read original source ->

External source stays available while the OJO article and comment thread stay local.

Comments load interactively on the live page.